Well this is not that difficult actually... just check out the following snippet from an MSN conversation that took place today.... bla bla bla ...
[15:59] female: how is the food she ordered compared with what I ordered before?
[16:01] male: hmmm....
[16:01] male: it is different in a way
[16:02] male: well actually not very different
[16:02] male: she ordered more of the things we used to...
[16:02] male: prones in any possible form
[16:02] female: prawns?
[16:02] male: yes
... bla bla bla ...
[16:09] female: she ordered your favourite 'sweet and sour something'?
[16:11] male: no she didn't
[16:11] male: that was something with nudels
[16:11] female: noodle?
[16:11] male: yes
... bla bla bla ...
So now it is just a simple method of deduction with will lead us to the clue. Consider following similarities prawn =porn, noodle=nude... isn't it more than obvious. Damn, this terminology gave away too easy.
9 comments:
another reason: you are -15 german.
I never even implied that the person which has been made anonymous as male has a slightest commonality with me ;-)
Hey, hey, i am watching you. i know who you are.
Why does it not surprise me that the *male* is someone familiar...
Look anonymous have courage to out yourself. Somehow it doesn't surprise me too that the anonymous commentator here is the same person as *female* aforementioned in the post ;-)
there are more than one 'Anonymous' here.
Anonymous has absolute right to remain anonymous unless one choose to forfeit that right, one can remain anonymous.
Besides, there is really more than one 'Anonymous' here. Why is the author so sure that Anonymous is Female?
Well... the author is sure about 2 anonymous... pretty much sure about being able to tackle them down to some known personalities ;-)
Known or Unknown? True or False?
Post a Comment